please I need help

1- introduction
2- A summary of the existing arguments by the critics you want to argue with
3- tell the reader why their arguments incomplete
4- present your own argument
5- develop it with examples
6- conclusion


Let me give you an example. Suppose you want to argue about the Tourism in the Middle East

This essay talks about the importance of tourism in the middle east. Critic John has mentioned that the Middle East is not the good place to visit due to the high number of crimes and suicide incidents. Also, critic Tom has talked about the difficulty of going for tourism in the middle east because of the hot weather

Critic John's argument is incomplete because it seems that he did not visit the middle east, and he is merely talking on what he sees in the media. Unfortunately, the media has not given us the clear picture. Therefore, what critic John has mentioned is incomplete and can be easily refuted

Also, the argument of critic Tom is easily be refuted because he talked about the weather. We know that the weather changes all the year, and the tourist can pick the most appropriate time that he or she prefers in order to enjoy the tourism

My argument is that the middle east is a good place to visit because,pla pla pla

thank you so much but I want to know the first body about
my opinion the second body about others don't agree with me
the third body about rebuttal